University of Northern British Columbia Apply Today
  INFORMATION FOR:
 INFORMATION ABOUT:
 TOOLS FOR STUDENTS
LOGIN SEARCH CONTACT HOME

News Media Resources

  An Evolutionary Hand-Me-Down?

 
“When in our evolutionary history did our ancestors develop a right-hand bias, and what does it mean?"
 
Richard Lazenby
 
Associate Professor, Anthropology
PhD Biological Anthropology (McMaster University)
 
Contact:  
lazenby@unbc.ca
(250) 960-6696
 
Humans are the only primate to demonstrate handedness at the species level and Anthropology professor Richard Lazenby believes that understanding this phenomenon will lead to new answers concerning our evolution.
 
About 90% of people are right-handed, but nobody really knows why. We also don’t know when we developed a hand preference. Was it a few thousand years ago or a few million? Answering the question goes far beyond simply understanding hand preference. It may go to the core of human evolution and our development of a sophisticated language. This is possible because fine motor control and speech function have both gradually evolved in the left side of the brain. “Handedness may be tied both to the development of fine manipulation for tool production and to speech for the transmission of knowledge related to such activities,” says Dr. Lazenby. “If this is an area where humans are different from other primates, it begs a question: When in our evolutionary history did our ancestors develop a right-hand bias?”
 
Thanks to funding from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Dr. Lazenby is answering the question together with colleagues from the University of Calgary and the Caribbean Primate Research Centre at the University of Puerto Rico. Just as exercising muscles makes them grow larger, bone size and shape are also determined by their mechanical functions. Using 200-year old skeletons from an archaeological dig in Ontario, the research team is comparing the hand structures on the left and right sides. State-of-the-art computing equipment is making it possible. Very high-resolution images of both the outside and inside of the bone are providing information on overall size, the density of the bone, and the internal microarchitecture.
 
“The equipment has helped us identify a pattern,” says Dr. Lazenby. “Among some of our findings, we are seeing that the right-hand bones are larger and there is a greater volume of bone per unit of mass.”
 
Tying their results to evolution, Dr. Lazenby and his fellow researchers will extend the same techniques to studying the bone structures of non-human primates that don’t prefer one hand over the other. Eventually, their findings will be applied to the human fossil record in an attempt to answer Dr. Lazenby’s initial question: When did our ancestors develop a right-hand bias and what does it mean?
 
Contact the Office of Communications

Rob van Adrichem
Director, Media & Public Relations 
(250) 960-5622
 
Downloads 

 
Related Links
 
Dr. Lazenby's Bio

Richard Lazenby's NSERC-funded research areas include primate functional skeletal biology, forensic anthropology, and human ecology and adaptability. He has authored a number of articles in journals, including the American Journal of Physical Anthropology, the American Journal of Human Biology, the Journal of Theoretical Biology, The Anatomical Record, the International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, Current Anthropology, Investigative Radiology and the Journal of Forensic Sciences. Dr. Lazenby¹s current research program addresses the origins of human handedness through a comparative study of geometric morphometric variation in the hand skeleton of human and non-human primates. He is past-President of the Canadian Association for Physical Anthropology, and is a consulting forensic anthropologist for the Office of the Regional Coroner for northern British Columbia, and with the RCMP 'E' Division, attached to the Missing Women's Task Force in Vancouver..  
Click on the image to download a high resolution file.
 

This is a slice through the head of a microCT scanned 2nd metacarpal (the dark brown one seen in the image with the ruler). This image shows the fine lattice network of trabecular bone in which we are able to measure side differences in features such as the amount present (a variable called Bone Volume Fraction), the number and thickness of individual trabeculae, the spacing between trabeculae, the degree of connectivity, and the orientation. Not all of the variables are asymmetric, for example there is no significant difference in the number of trabeculae, but they do differ in average thickness (greater in the right hand).
 

This image (left) shows the bones of the human hand, including the wrist (the bottom of the image), the palm (the numbered bones – the second metacarpal is the subject of this pilot study), and the digits (the three rows of smaller bones called phalanges which correspond to our fingers.)

This image (left) shows an intact second metacarpal next to the head of one of the bones used in this study. The scan slice in lazenbyimage 1 was produced from the original scan of this particular bone.
 

University of Northern British Columbia
3333 University Way, Prince George, BC, Canada, V2N 4Z9   |  Website Feedback  |  Contact Security